.
I am not sure what to say about The Illuminated Man: Life, Death, and the Worlds of J. G. Ballard, which I've just finished reading. It's as if a book had escaped from the real of dreams--one which starts as one particular thing and then, as you read, becomes something else before returning to its original purpose and then warping into yet something entirely different.
Okay, let me explain.
David Pringle, over the course of many years, amassed and organized in a chronology some 400,000 words of biographical facts and quotes about the life and works of J. G. Ballard. Christopher Priest, who admired Ballard greatly, urged him to turn those notes into a biography.
Pringle, unhappily, had health issues that prevented him from taking on such a task. He suggested that Priest write the book instead. Priest's partner and later wife, Nina Allan, urged him to do so.
Putting aside the novel he had been working on, Priest began writing a critical biography, one he explicitly hoped would force the British literary establishment to include Ballard in the Canon. He was in good health at the onset of the project, but a fast-acting cancer felled him before he could complete the task, though by then he had written a great deal of the book.
Shortly before his death, Ms. Allan took over.
Here, the book takes a swerve, because Allan, seeing parallels between Ballard's life and works and those of her late husband's, inserted Priest into the narrative as a kind of "twin" to Ballard. Her primary emphasis, however, was on Ballard's works, where, it has to be said, she did a good job. The seams only show where she inserted the first-person pronoun into the text so the reader would know exactly whose experiences and opinions were being presented.
But there is also Allan's detailed account of Priest's illness, decline, and death. Which segues into her analysis of her own grief. She was clearly working her way through the pain and toward acceptance.
Then back to Ballard.
So there are, by my analysis, six major strands to the work: Ballard's life, Priest's analysis of his works, Priest's literary life, his illness and death, Allan's working-through of her still-raw sorrow and (at the end) a meditation on biography and on the book itself. It is a miracle that this isn't a complete botch. For which, full credit must go to Tina Allan and whatever editor she must surely have worked with.
But when it comes to passing judgment on The Illuminated Man, I am completely out of my depth. Does it achieve any of its goals from forcing Ballard into the Canon to easing a widow's grief? I have no idea. I can only say that it kept my interest throughout. Also, that there will surely always be readers for a work so uniquely structured.
I can think of no book remotely like it.
*
CHECK FACTS!!!






