.
Marianne Porter's latest Dragonstairs Press chapbook, Singular Interviews, will
be offered for sale at noon Eastern time this coming Saturday, and sell
out shortly thereafter. A quarter-century in the making, each of my
interviews with a science fiction or fantasy notable is exactly one
question long. Meanwhile, here's my favorite of the lot--the single most concise and enlightening summation of Michael Moorcock's oeuvre I've ever encountered. By the man who knows more about it than anyone else.
SINGULAR
INTERVIEWS: MICHAEL MOORCOCK
QUESTION: When and why did you decide to interconnect all
your stories and novels to make of them a single metafiction?
MICHAEL MOORCOCK: I frequently read that my aspiration was
to ‘improve’ science fiction in some way by shifting emphasis away from its
traditional subject matter and calling for higher standards of
writing. Actually I wanted to introduce the techniques and subject
matter of sf and fantasy into ‘literary’ or non-generic work, to broaden the
concerns of general fiction which I believed to be moribund. For all
I know this was going to happen anyway so I was perhaps just one of many people
trying to do the same but at the time I knew very few people who agreed with
me. The likes of Kingsley Amis, in fact, vehemently disagreed with me. My ambition inspired my criticism and
my editorship of NEW WORLDS. None of this, of course, happened
overnight. It took a few years to develop a coherent sense of
exactly how this could be achieved and demonstrated.
I read Zweig’s biography of Balzac when I was 15 and as a
journalist learned, like him, to write at high speeds without giving myself
time to revise, developing ideas from one story to another rather than refining
a single piece, but I was never consciously inspired by him. My first version
of The Eternal Champion was written in 1957 when I was 17 and was pretty crudely
written but contained the idea, perhaps inspired by Arnold’s Phra the
Phoenician, of a protagonist
constantly reborn to fight a cause over and over again through different
historical periods and locales. My description of what I called a
‘multiverse’, The Sundered Worlds, a story which looked at a many worlds theory, first
explored in fiction by Wells, from as it were the outside as an observable
phenomenon, was published in 1963,
but I didn’t start to consider my work as one large novel until 1968 when I
began A Cure For Cancer, the second Jerry Cornelius book, and realized I could
refine ideas over many books by linking them to the same characters in different
situations and circumstances.
I’m not for a moment comparing my work to Balzac’s Human Comedy, but I might have come to it for similar reasons, practical
as well as artistic, continuing themes and ideas via the same characters in
often very disparate places, historical periods and invented worlds, enabling
me to write stories which moved from generic fiction to literary fiction and so
break down the barriers between them as editorially I tried to encourage
authors to do in New Worlds. This quickly enabled me to write books
which were part realistic and part fantastic and thus carry ideas organically
from one sequence of stories, absurdist, fantastic and realistic, to
another. A relatively minor character,
such as Colonel Pyat of the Cornelius stories, could become the self-deceiving,
unreliable narrator of a realistic examination of the 20th century
roots of the Nazi holocaust, while a character like Elric can appear in a
fantasy or a comedy without any apparent incongruity. They can, like players in a Commedia dell’
Arte sketch, keep their essential personalities and moral character from piece
to piece and carry a theme which can be looked at from many different aspects
and narratives. They offer the reader
echoes, as it were, which bring a feeling of familiarity without the kind of
distracting (and disappointing) rationale which, in my view, frequently ruins a
good story. In this sense they should
produce a feeling of resolution more like music than most fiction. Whether I’ve been successful in this, of
course, is for the reader to decide.
*