.
I've got a contest! No, actually, I've got a scam. But as far as you are concerned, it's every bit as good as a contest. It costs you no money whatsoever to enter, and if you win you get a prize.
Let me explain:
It's not exactly a secret that I'm in the final throes of writing a novel about the adventures of Postutopian con-men extraordinaire Darger and Surplus. The world I created for them (highly advanced in the biosciences, sensibly terrified of anything electronic) is entertaining but cruel. In their first adventure, "The Dog Said Bow-Wow," I established that the rich have servants called autistics, who are obedient and completely without affect and whose cheap virtue is that you can do anything you want in front of them and they don't care and won't react. Essentially, they have neither personality nor sense of self.
Nobody's ever complained about these characters being called "autistics." But that's largely because the readership for short fiction is small, sophisticated, and surprisingly tolerant. If I use the term in a novel, I'm sure to get letters from people who are, for good and possibly even heartbreaking reasons, genuinely offended and/or hurt by the usage.
And, to tell you the truth, I'm not exactly crazy about it myself.
Nevertheless, I want to keep the servants -- they have a small but significant role to play in the novel. So they need a new name.
Here's my challenge: Come up with a new name for my novel's "autistics." Something that suggests their inverted and impersonal nature.
And here's the prize: If I use your suggestion, I'll give you an autographed copy of the Darger and Surplus novel when it comes out. Even better, I'll make it the second copy of it I receive. (The first copy is for waving around at conventions.) I'll even guarantee to make it the first autographed copy ever. Plus I'll put your name in the acknowledgments. Unless you'd rather remain anonymous, of course.
What makes this a particularly good deal is that you're writing for publication. The winner can look at the book's price and claim that's how much she or he routinely gets paid per word.
You can post your suggestion(s) here or after any subsequent blog entry. I'll read 'em all. As soon as somebody comes up with le neologism juste, I'll proclaim the fact in the next day's blog.
Above: Today's mail. An old pal sent me cigars.
*
babels
ReplyDeletebioshells
interfaces
babelshells
I think a traditional term would be something like "null" - I'm fairly sure there's precedent elsewhere.
ReplyDeleteMy first thought is you could call them "the remote".
ReplyDeleteOh, oh! - and then you could have a scene where someone gets incredibly frustrated because they can't find the remote.
... I'll keep thinking.
I was thinking something Latin might be good. I haven't read The Dog Said Bow-Wow yet, so I'm not really familiar with the prejudices and social conventions of the upper class in this universe, but it seems like Latin might give it a ring of prestige, or at least the avoidance of sounding crass that would appeal to someone who can afford such things. Lacunas might be a good name for them. If I'm recalling correctly it means an empty space, a hole, and I think it can also mean deficiency. Some derivation of inanis (empty, inane), or vacuus (empty, devoid of, free from) also seems like it might a good substitute as well.
ReplyDeleteHow about "empties"?
ReplyDeleteHmmm... "Auts" might work, for both "autistic and "automaton", without explicitly being either. "aut" can also be a contraction of "naught", or imply "ought". All seem appropriate for the empty shells of humans who are used as servants.
ReplyDeletedispassionati (singular dispassionato, dispassionata)
ReplyDeletePerhaps something like "voids"?
ReplyDeleteOr the Latin form, "vacuus." Could even be abbreviated to "vacs" or "vacks" or some such similar derivation.
why not use Latin roots indeed? For example sibei which means self or suimet: oneself corresponding to the Greek "auto". Another suggestions is "the secreti(sts) meaning "the loners" or "solitaries
ReplyDeleteBeing the mother of two autistic sons, I am grateful for your consideration and your wish not to hurt people.
Finally,French being my mother tongue the French you speak in your posts is excellent even if you have never learnt it and it makes me happy!
dispassionati
ReplyDeleteI don't know if it helps to "make a case" for a word--maybe it should stand on its own--but for me this has interesting echoes of "castrati."
Other ideas:
apaths
stolids
stoics
phlegmats
Maybe some variation on solipsist? Solipsi, or some such.
ReplyDeleteMay be:
ReplyDelete"outlings",
"otherling",
"outworlders",
"laymen"
Keep on thinking.
Alexei
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletecatalepts
ReplyDeletevacants
blanks
What about "numb" and "numbs"?
ReplyDeleteServiles
ReplyDeleteAdroits
Vascellum
Enigmatics
Or your can steal my username and call them Zamzummim (the whisperers/mumblers), but if you do that can you please make Surplus an English Setter? They're tricky enough, and they are charmers =)
Oh, and Savants.
ReplyDeleteblankslates?
ReplyDeleteThe Zaru (after the see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil monkeys).
ReplyDeleteI loved the Darger and Surplus stories in the Dog Said Bow-Wow, and I'm very much looking forward to the novel!
Well, Nisi infractus, noli reficere, as I always say. But this needs some fixing, so how about egelidus (tepid, lukewarm) or inauct (the opposite of auctor)
ReplyDeleteNotre Dame offers a good resource on Latin grammar at http://archives.nd.edu/latgramm.htm They might give you insight into the connotations of some euphonious Latin word.
Neal Stephenson used "Aut" in a very different sense in Anathem; you may want to avoid that one.
How about "blanks" or "blasé" (not sure how to pluralize the second.
ReplyDeletealso "empties" or "vacants"
ReplyDeleteand lastly:
ReplyDeletemask
gap
hollow
rasa
stiff (stiffs)
vacancy
clear
minus (not sure of plural)
idiot servant or idioservant
ReplyDeletehoneycombs
puppets
"empty" (I like the association with empty cans)
ReplyDelete"marionette"
"cipher" (or "shifra" in russian, "sifar" in arabic)
"nobody"
"goose egg"
It's not that I don't want a signed copy of the new book, but how's anyone going to beat the previously suggested "the remote"? That's brilliant.
What a creative and verbal group this is!
ReplyDeleteI'm mulling over (and over and over)all the suggestions so far. And the contest is still open. Though I may yet end up using something already suggested. (That's why I'm still mulling.)
What makes it difficult is that the term has to fit in with the esthetic of all the other terms and names in the novel. "Savant," for instance, is already taken, for a type of servant whose function is information storage and retrieval. So it's not usable, but it WAS a shrewd guess.
Keep your ideas coming. I'm genuinely grateful for them.
kea-nus. (I would say Boreanazes, but that would give away seeing Angel in the morning and Bones at night.)
ReplyDeleteHmmm...howzabout
ReplyDeletedrifts
wisps
shallows
?
"empture(s)" - empty + creature(s)
ReplyDeleteKeep on thinking...
how about...
ReplyDeletedissociate (kind of like the opposite of an associate. OK, this makes no sense)
Looks like Richard got the good ones... I'd say "phlegmat" is my favorite.
I like to think that Darger is named after Henry Darger - many layered, endlessly complex, still kind of childish, though. I think Rothko paintings, on the other hand, are much more abstract, and the only emotions involved in them are the ones that you bring to them, though I also get the Rothko would smack me upside the head for thinking that. Still, I think one could call the characters "rothkos" or "rothkovians" or something similar, communicating the idea of abstraction without connoting simplicity. maybe monkey with the spelling and make them rothcoes or something.
ReplyDeleteshades
ReplyDeleteeclipses
transits
...gotta admit, I liked 'rothkoes'!
Great contest/scam, Michael.
idiks
ReplyDeleteneuters
noters
Butlers, who traditionally saw nothing they were not supposed to and were perfectly obedient.
ReplyDeleteor butler rasa: emphasise both their obedience and emptiness.
jeeves
ReplyDeletevasis - utensil
ReplyDeleteGerät - utensil
posuda, posyushka - latinized from the cyrillic посуда, посйусхка, utensil, little utensil
vasculum - a small vessel
sosud, sosudka - latinized from сосуд, сосудка, vessel, little vessel
naughts
ReplyDeletenadas
affectless (the plural the same as the singular I guess)
PNGs (short for 'persona non grata')
vagues
How about "notheres" (as in Gertrude Stein's crack about Oakland)?
ReplyDelete(You actually seem to be describing golems but without the sense of menace.)
What about The aloof or the impervious?
ReplyDeleteThe portmanteau word which has been suggested "emptures" is a good idea.
Dauersch;af: "a rarely-used form of therapy which employs medication to induce a coma-like state."
ReplyDeleteThe stuff you learn! I just gleaned this from the sixth volume of Roger Zelazny's Collected Stories: 'The Road to Amber' [pg. 361] Sure miss that gentleman.
I meant: Dauerschlaf. One of our maniacal cats is helping me type.
ReplyDeleteMay I suggest "autants"?
ReplyDeleteMade-up word but it combines suggestions of autonomic and servant.
Bruce - thanks for expanding my world with "Dauerschlaf". It made me think of one of my favourite scandals - the indiscriminate use of induced comas in Australia in the 60s and 70s:
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_sleep_therapy#Australian_Chelmsford_scandal
Partials?
ReplyDeleteinsentients
ReplyDeleteinsensates
It has always seemed to me like Victorians liked to use adjectives as nouns, though this impression might be retroactive.
Thank you, Mr. Swanwick, for this contest/scam. I've already gained from it because it led me to seek out "The Dog Said Bow-Wow" which I enjoyed thoroughly.
ReplyDeleteI'll have to sleep on a word to replace autistics. Several good suggestions have been made, perhaps I can add mine to the hat in the morning.
Thanks again.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteascete
ReplyDeleteascetapathic
ascetematon
asceto
ascetor
wallflowers
ReplyDeleteHannah's Dad: You're welcome!
ReplyDeleteaphasiacs
waldos
Nat Whilk sent you cigars from la République des Rêves? And they made it across international lines without being examined? Perhaps the dogs can't sniff the mind-altering substances from la République.
ReplyDeleteAs to terminology: What about something like serf, peasant, or (my personal choice) thrall?
That is quite an upscale return address.
ReplyDelete308 Blvd of the Naked Angels
Dreamer(f) Town
Republic of Dreams
Quite the philatelic specimen too.
Actually, the stamp collection is rather light, if the package did indeed come from NGC 151.
ReplyDeleteIt has to be something someone would actually say.
ReplyDeleteI vote: dimmi, a play on "dummy," "dimwit," and "dhimmi," or Muslim-subjugated non-Muslims, more formally: "a non-Muslim subject of a state governed in accordance with sharia law. The term connotes an obligation of the state to protect the individual, including the individual's life, property, and freedom of religion and worship, and required loyalty to the empire, and a poll tax known as the jizya."
Plays a nice command: "Gimme, dimmi!" as in "give me that you dimwit."
I don't know what future dystopia YOUR book contemplates, but one of at least SOME sort of Muslim subjugation (or influence therefrom) is certainly a potential outcome (and, indeed, simply a rehash of what has come before; cf. Hungary and the Ottoman Empire...) or is happening now (cf., e.g., the cartoon killings in Denmark).
As for the person who noted "numb," I would offer a term from my youth -- nummie (as in "numbskull").
Real words (most of them) are not consciously derived from Latin or Greek, they just... arrive.
"rich have servants called autistics, who are obedient and completely without affect and whose cheap virtue is that you can do anything you want in front of them and they don't care and won't react. Essentially, they have neither personality nor sense of self."
ReplyDeleteI'm going to go with "congressmen"
If you are using "savant," real usage would quickly shorten that to "savvy" or "savvies," which works pretty well, too. (Hence, dimmies and savvies would be complementary).
ReplyDeleteInterestingly, I actually use the term "prole" as intended by Orwell (and wish I were one, NASCAR and all...). (And the enormity of Big Brother goes w/o saying...).
You will note that not too many terms from Clockwork Orange every really caught on. Overly self-conscious constructions just get in the way.
I did, by the way, agree with the commenter who suggested "congressman." Ha!
I keep circling the idea of them being empty emotionally. Perhaps VESSEL? Which also leads me to think of the medieval term VASSAL. Would a combination of the terms express the idea, VESSAL or VASSEL?
ReplyDeleteAlso -
STIFF
DRUDGE
and I loved the idea of thrall- Good one Pat J.
I like wallflowers as well
ReplyDeleteWhy not the voidservants or the hollowhusks? Something like the French neologism" creuxvides"
ReplyDeleteArties
ReplyDeleteArchibalds (they all have the same name which is nice and dehumanizing)
miltons
ReplyDelete"They also serve who only stand and wait"
On His Blindness (1655)
http://www.bartleby.com/4/313.html
What about nimrod?
ReplyDeletetroissinges
ReplyDeleteNot sure why the neologism should end up French, but this was the best of the Babelfished translations of "three monkeys" that came up, though the Italian is OK - "trescimmie".
Oh, and it appears Alison beat me to the concept anyway.
ReplyDeleteYou could call them "empties."
ReplyDeleteor "Voids."
or "Devoids."
Has anyone suggested "puppets."
ReplyDelete"There are many advantages in puppets. They never argue. They have no crude views about art. They have no private lives". Oscar Wilde
ReplyDeleteIn that spirit, here are two specialized puppets for your consideration:
Bunraku
Marotte
rintin
ReplyDeletegromet
factoto
fidomestique
fidociary
Are we barking up the right tree yet?
ReplyDeleteGod knows, I appreciate every drop of blood you guys have put into this. Some of the suggestions are brilliant, some are not, and a number would be great in another context. (I'm thinking of the Italianate terms here, which would be quite useful if Darger and Surplus had an adventure in Venice -- as, of course, someday they must.)
ReplyDeleteThe bad news is that I haven't decided on a winner yet. The good news is that I will soon.
That's a serious promise.
It seems to me that Autistic is such a pithy word that any substitution is going to require some sort of exposition. Autistic implies that the person is that way involuntarily (possibly just another product of the Winooski gene mills, but there's no need to point that out.) The reference to the "Indentures of 100 Autistics" might imply otherwise, but I can't shake the feeling that the person is not that way by choice.
ReplyDeleteThe substitute neologism is elusive because you can't pack all the same connotations into another word.
This is a tough one.
You're absolutely right, Joe. I had this same conversation with my son Sean just last night. And after he'd spelled out all the ways that "autistic " worked -- most specifically, the implied cruelty of what had been done to them -- he ended by saying, "But of course you can't use it."
ReplyDeleteAll this trouble over a single word! It really brings out what a mysterious art fiction is.
I could not agree more: an autistic
ReplyDeleteperson's brain is not" wired" to decipher the outside world and relate to others. I always say in French:" ce n'est pas qu'ils ne veulent pas mais ne peuvent pas" to stress their inability.
Besides when the psychiatrist Eugene Bleuler first coined the word in 1910, he described schizophrenia...
Sometimes I dream that someone would write a story about how autistic people are the only ones who can understand and interact with aliens landing on earth thus contributing to save human kind from a lot of serious troubles...after all their way of perceiving things and thinking is so different thatextraterrestrials could bond with them.
I suppose it is the positive thinking of a mother!
They are more or less trapped in their own minds. So finding a word is very tricky indeed but challenging.
Call 'em "arties" then.
ReplyDeleteAccented (boston?) version of "autistic" then shortened
amygdalic one who has a diminished or modified amygdala.
ReplyDeleteFrom http://www.sci.uidaho.edu/med532/amygdala.htm
"amygdala (uh mig' dull uh)
It is a set of subcortical nuclei that is important for perceiving in others and having in oneself emotional or affective behaviors and feelings (e.g. fear, anger). It is, therefore, a component of the limbic system.
The amygdala is both large and just beneath the surface of the front, medial part of the temporal lobe where it causes the bulge on the surface called the uncus.
It got its name from its shape - like an 'almond'."
Again, I think that "normal" folks would shorten/slangify such a word. Dolly or dollies (or even, Dalis, bringing in a ref to the melty type world...).
ReplyDeleteNonnies (anonymous, no-ones, no-bodies)
ReplyDeleteAutomen (sounds too Dr Who...)
Nobs
Onoffs (on-offs)
This is fun. Do writers spend most of their days sitting around trying to come up with names and telling themselves it is actual work?
Yes, honestly, we do. The sad thing is that we have to come up with those words (or titles) in order for the story or novel to work, and the better they are, the better the particular work will do. So it's actually real and necessary work.
ReplyDeleteAnd just to prove my point: My first novel was titled In the Drift. Bill Gibson's was titled Neuromancer. Guess which one is considered a classic today?
[Okay, okay, I hastily admit, there were other reasons as well. But that ultra-cool title didn't hurt.]
Sounds a little bit like gambling...
ReplyDeleteWhat about:
ReplyDeleteNulling
Nullings
> And just to prove my point: My first
ReplyDelete> novel was titled In the Drift.
> Bill Gibson's was titled Neuromancer.
> Guess which one is considered a classic today?
Well yes - but Neuromancer, while considered a 'classic', only sold a few hundred copies. Gibson didn't break out of the literary-sf ghetto until he wrote 'The Log of the Mustang Sally'.
Or so I am told.